Audi Repair Dubai · Corrections & Updates
Corrections and Content Updates Policy
How we handle factual errors, technical corrections, outdated specifications, price changes, broken links, business-detail changes, and material updates.
A useful automotive site has to be correct more often than it is polished. When evidence shows that a statement is materially wrong, the right response is to fix it rather than defend old wording.
What deserves correction
We review issues that could materially affect a reader’s understanding, safety decision, repair choice, cost expectation, or trust in the business. Examples include an incorrect technical statement, wrong specification, misleading diagnostic claim, outdated warranty wording, inaccurate price context, broken internal link, or incorrect workshop information.
How to report a problem
Send the page URL, identify the sentence, table, image, or section you believe is wrong, and include useful supporting detail if you have it. A clear report is easier to verify than a general statement that a page is inaccurate.
How we verify it
Depending on the issue, we may compare the page with vehicle-specific technical information, workshop records, diagnostic evidence, manufacturer documentation, parts data, current business information, or other reliable sources.
We do not treat search rankings, competitor wording, or an AI answer as proof that a technical statement is correct.
Different changes need different treatment
- Minor editorial edits include grammar, spelling, formatting, readability, or a link update that does not change the substance of the page.
- Material corrections change technical meaning, safety advice, pricing context, warranty language, legal information, or another point that could affect a reader’s decision.
- Routine updates reflect changes in services, parts availability, workshop details, software, vehicle information, or other facts that legitimately change over time.
Correction notes and dates
Not every typo needs a public correction notice. Where practical, a material correction should be reflected through the page’s updated date or a note when readers would otherwise be misled about what changed. The goal is transparency without turning ordinary maintenance into noise.
What we will not do
- Keep a statement we know is materially wrong because it ranks well.
- Remove a legitimate technical limitation merely to make a service sound better.
- Invent a source, credential, test result, or customer case to support an old claim.
- Change accurate information solely because it is inconvenient or unfavorable.
- Use a correction request as a reason to collect unnecessary personal information.
Preserving useful URLs
Where possible, correcting or improving a page should not require changing its URL. Stable URLs help readers, internal links, bookmarks, and search engines reach the corrected version instead of creating avoidable dead ends.